Oct16

Your controversial opinions

Keep it clean, folks - remember, you don't have to directly insult another user to create a negative atmosphere, so try to stay away from using charged language when discussing games or mechanics ('dumb', 'idiotic', 'worthless' etc).

And with that out of the way, it's time to put on the knuckle-dusters...

1: N is completely right, and you can kind of tell that the Gen V games aren't comfortable addressing his worldview head-on. One of the major appeals of the main series titles is the heavily personalised experience, predicated on owning and manipulating stylised animals. Let's be real, we're not here because Weezing is our friend, but because we taught our Weezing Thunderbolt.

2: Sinnoh is fondly remembered primarily because Diamond and Pearl were the first titles on an excellent handheld, but they're actually very poor playthroughs (in contention for worst overall), overwhelmingly because of the species selection. In Red and Blue you'll get pounced on by vicious little rat monsters the moment you step foot in the grass, and terrorised by Mankeys and Spearows not long after. Diamond and Pearl's early species are the Duplo to the Lego, with twee, inoffensive animals like Bidoof, Budew, Buizel, Combee, Cherrim and more.
chocovelvetcake Written by WyndonCalling